Bad Energy Policies Will Harm World Economies
In 2000 a new US administration drafted a new energy plan. Two oilmen, with secret advice of the oil industry, orchestrated and supervised the plan. The results have been devastating. Gas and oil prices have escalated to more than $4 per gallon and are forecast to hit $5 per gallon soon.
The problems our oilmen were trying to solve, were not of their doing. Their decision, to solve the energy puzzle, was laudable. Regrettably, they were not equipped to handle the consequences of their actions.
In November 2008 the US is reaching another milestone in history. A new president and a new Congress will be elected. Energy is becoming one of the main issues of the hotly contested election campaign. We already know one outcome for sure. Neither candidate has any idea about the seriousness of the energy problems confronting our country and the world.
The US needs swift and effective actions to stabilize world energy prices, to introduce measures for dealing with global warming and climate change, and to turn around an economy that has been looted by its financial sector. How can the US take the lead in fighting global warming? How can the US send the right signals to the rest of the world? How can the US convince the owners of the world's oil reserves that coercive price fixing is breeding resentment?
The US does not possess a single weapon to force its intentions upon others. It can do so only by the quality of her ideas.
Owners of coal, petroleum, and natural gas reserves will only change, if they have to face risks. These new risks could be:
The near-future threat of a low priced petroleum substitute,
The threat of subsidized renewable energies for the generation of low cost electricity,
The threat of a treaty that will outlaw fossil fuel burning across the world.
When these threats become reality, we will see a rush to sell as many energy reserves as quickly as possible.
Without these threats the decision process is much simpler. Sell as little energy as possible and wait for prices to rise. The longer you wait, the more money you make.
Obviously, it will take time to convert fossil fuel fired power plants to plants that are powered by renewable energies like solar power, hydropower, wind power, marine power, geothermal heat, and nuclear heat. Obviously, it will take time to produce the first barrel of a high quality petroleum substitute from fast growing plants that have no resemblance to food crops and can be grown on arid lands. Obviously, it will take even longer to convince 200 countries to sign a treaty that forbids the use of fossil fuels. But what choices do the US and the world have? We cannot continue and emit huge amounts of greenhouse gases much longer. The environmental costs are beginning to escalate. Citizens across the world will demand actions from governments.
Countries with large coastal areas are already experiencing the accelerating rise of ocean levels. This rise will speed up in lockstep with greenhouse gas emissions. Once carbon dioxide, the major product of fossil fuel combustion, enters the atmosphere, it cannot be recaptured. The accumulation of carbon dioxide is irreversible and the accelerated melting of glaciers on mountains and of ice sheets in the Polar Regions is unstoppable.
The problems our oilmen were trying to solve, were not of their doing. Their decision, to solve the energy puzzle, was laudable. Regrettably, they were not equipped to handle the consequences of their actions.
In November 2008 the US is reaching another milestone in history. A new president and a new Congress will be elected. Energy is becoming one of the main issues of the hotly contested election campaign. We already know one outcome for sure. Neither candidate has any idea about the seriousness of the energy problems confronting our country and the world.
The US needs swift and effective actions to stabilize world energy prices, to introduce measures for dealing with global warming and climate change, and to turn around an economy that has been looted by its financial sector. How can the US take the lead in fighting global warming? How can the US send the right signals to the rest of the world? How can the US convince the owners of the world's oil reserves that coercive price fixing is breeding resentment?
The US does not possess a single weapon to force its intentions upon others. It can do so only by the quality of her ideas.
Owners of coal, petroleum, and natural gas reserves will only change, if they have to face risks. These new risks could be:
The near-future threat of a low priced petroleum substitute,
The threat of subsidized renewable energies for the generation of low cost electricity,
The threat of a treaty that will outlaw fossil fuel burning across the world.
When these threats become reality, we will see a rush to sell as many energy reserves as quickly as possible.
Without these threats the decision process is much simpler. Sell as little energy as possible and wait for prices to rise. The longer you wait, the more money you make.
Obviously, it will take time to convert fossil fuel fired power plants to plants that are powered by renewable energies like solar power, hydropower, wind power, marine power, geothermal heat, and nuclear heat. Obviously, it will take time to produce the first barrel of a high quality petroleum substitute from fast growing plants that have no resemblance to food crops and can be grown on arid lands. Obviously, it will take even longer to convince 200 countries to sign a treaty that forbids the use of fossil fuels. But what choices do the US and the world have? We cannot continue and emit huge amounts of greenhouse gases much longer. The environmental costs are beginning to escalate. Citizens across the world will demand actions from governments.
Countries with large coastal areas are already experiencing the accelerating rise of ocean levels. This rise will speed up in lockstep with greenhouse gas emissions. Once carbon dioxide, the major product of fossil fuel combustion, enters the atmosphere, it cannot be recaptured. The accumulation of carbon dioxide is irreversible and the accelerated melting of glaciers on mountains and of ice sheets in the Polar Regions is unstoppable.
From materials of: http://articlebiz.com/article/201352-1-bad-energy-policies-w~
Published: July 25, 2008
Published: July 25, 2008
Keywords:
energy,
bad energy,
energy policies,
sell energy,
energy prices,
energy becoming,
energy plan,
energy problems,
energy puzzle,
energy possible
Last relative articles:
Comments: [0] / Post comment:
04 Feb 2012 00:03:43
INFLUENCE GAME: Big donors and what they want - Fox News
INFLUENCE GAME: Big donors and what they want Fox News Some are pressing for new laws or regulations that would benefit their interests in energy , mining and high finance. The Associated Press reviewed financial reports, regulatory filings, court records, public statements and more to identify favors that ...
03 Feb 2012 23:41:27
Contango Widest Since October in Cushing Deluge: Energy Markets - San Francisco Chronicle
Proactive Investors UK Contango Widest Since October in Cushing Deluge: Energy Markets San Francisco Chronicle Crude is flooding into storage terminals in Cushing, Oklahoma, the delivery point for WTI futures, as production from Canada and North Dakota increases, curbing the US dependence on imports to the least in more than a decade, according to Energy ... The Energy Report - The Wolf is at the Door North Sea Oil Exports to Asia at 8-Year High: Energy Markets Oil ends lower, near $96 a barrel -
03 Feb 2012 22:40:08
Ankara will not halt oil trade with Iran: Turkish energy minister - Tehran Times
IBNLive.com Ankara will not halt oil trade with Iran: Turkish energy minister Tehran Times Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz has said Turkey will continue buying oil and natural gas from Iran despite US sanctions imposed against Iran's energy sector. In a press conference on Tuesday, Yildiz said that as a neighbor country which trades ... Iran's nuclear programme and world's energy security US hits hard at Iran's energy sector
03 Feb 2012 22:01:29
Transocean Ltd. to Present at the Credit Suisse 2012 Energy Summit - Reuters
MSN Money Transocean Ltd. to Present at the Credit Suisse 2012 Energy Summit Reuters Transocean Ltd. Transocean Ltd. to Present at the Credit Suisse 2012 Energy Summit . Processed and transmitted by Thomson Reuters ONE. The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement. ZUG, SWITZERLAND--(Marketwire - February 3, ... Spectra Energy President & CEO Greg Ebel to Speak at Credit Suisse Energy Summit
03 Feb 2012 21:40:34
European cold snap threatens energy crisis as death toll rises - The Guardian
The Guardian European cold snap threatens energy crisis as death toll rises The Guardian An energy crisis is looming as Russian gas supplies to some states dwindle by up to 30%. Poland, Slovakia, Austria, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, Greece and Italy are those worst affected. On Thursday the Russian gas export monopoly Gazprom said it was ... Europe Faces Energy Crisis as Russia Cuts Gas Exports Amidst Deep Winter Freeze Yanukovych expects energy market participants to agree on upgrading Ukraine's GTS ENERGY MARKETS REPORT INCLUDING: Russian gas export monopoly Gazprom has ... -