Bad Energy Policies Will Harm World Economies
In 2000 a new US administration drafted a new energy plan. Two oilmen, with secret advice of the oil industry, orchestrated and supervised the plan. The results have been devastating. Gas and oil prices have escalated to more than $4 per gallon and are forecast to hit $5 per gallon soon.
The problems our oilmen were trying to solve, were not of their doing. Their decision, to solve the energy puzzle, was laudable. Regrettably, they were not equipped to handle the consequences of their actions.
In November 2008 the US is reaching another milestone in history. A new president and a new Congress will be elected. Energy is becoming one of the main issues of the hotly contested election campaign. We already know one outcome for sure. Neither candidate has any idea about the seriousness of the energy problems confronting our country and the world.
The US needs swift and effective actions to stabilize world energy prices, to introduce measures for dealing with global warming and climate change, and to turn around an economy that has been looted by its financial sector. How can the US take the lead in fighting global warming? How can the US send the right signals to the rest of the world? How can the US convince the owners of the world's oil reserves that coercive price fixing is breeding resentment?
The US does not possess a single weapon to force its intentions upon others. It can do so only by the quality of her ideas.
Owners of coal, petroleum, and natural gas reserves will only change, if they have to face risks. These new risks could be:
The near-future threat of a low priced petroleum substitute,
The threat of subsidized renewable energies for the generation of low cost electricity,
The threat of a treaty that will outlaw fossil fuel burning across the world.
When these threats become reality, we will see a rush to sell as many energy reserves as quickly as possible.
Without these threats the decision process is much simpler. Sell as little energy as possible and wait for prices to rise. The longer you wait, the more money you make.
Obviously, it will take time to convert fossil fuel fired power plants to plants that are powered by renewable energies like solar power, hydropower, wind power, marine power, geothermal heat, and nuclear heat. Obviously, it will take time to produce the first barrel of a high quality petroleum substitute from fast growing plants that have no resemblance to food crops and can be grown on arid lands. Obviously, it will take even longer to convince 200 countries to sign a treaty that forbids the use of fossil fuels. But what choices do the US and the world have? We cannot continue and emit huge amounts of greenhouse gases much longer. The environmental costs are beginning to escalate. Citizens across the world will demand actions from governments.
Countries with large coastal areas are already experiencing the accelerating rise of ocean levels. This rise will speed up in lockstep with greenhouse gas emissions. Once carbon dioxide, the major product of fossil fuel combustion, enters the atmosphere, it cannot be recaptured. The accumulation of carbon dioxide is irreversible and the accelerated melting of glaciers on mountains and of ice sheets in the Polar Regions is unstoppable.
The problems our oilmen were trying to solve, were not of their doing. Their decision, to solve the energy puzzle, was laudable. Regrettably, they were not equipped to handle the consequences of their actions.
In November 2008 the US is reaching another milestone in history. A new president and a new Congress will be elected. Energy is becoming one of the main issues of the hotly contested election campaign. We already know one outcome for sure. Neither candidate has any idea about the seriousness of the energy problems confronting our country and the world.
The US needs swift and effective actions to stabilize world energy prices, to introduce measures for dealing with global warming and climate change, and to turn around an economy that has been looted by its financial sector. How can the US take the lead in fighting global warming? How can the US send the right signals to the rest of the world? How can the US convince the owners of the world's oil reserves that coercive price fixing is breeding resentment?
The US does not possess a single weapon to force its intentions upon others. It can do so only by the quality of her ideas.
Owners of coal, petroleum, and natural gas reserves will only change, if they have to face risks. These new risks could be:
The near-future threat of a low priced petroleum substitute,
The threat of subsidized renewable energies for the generation of low cost electricity,
The threat of a treaty that will outlaw fossil fuel burning across the world.
When these threats become reality, we will see a rush to sell as many energy reserves as quickly as possible.
Without these threats the decision process is much simpler. Sell as little energy as possible and wait for prices to rise. The longer you wait, the more money you make.
Obviously, it will take time to convert fossil fuel fired power plants to plants that are powered by renewable energies like solar power, hydropower, wind power, marine power, geothermal heat, and nuclear heat. Obviously, it will take time to produce the first barrel of a high quality petroleum substitute from fast growing plants that have no resemblance to food crops and can be grown on arid lands. Obviously, it will take even longer to convince 200 countries to sign a treaty that forbids the use of fossil fuels. But what choices do the US and the world have? We cannot continue and emit huge amounts of greenhouse gases much longer. The environmental costs are beginning to escalate. Citizens across the world will demand actions from governments.
Countries with large coastal areas are already experiencing the accelerating rise of ocean levels. This rise will speed up in lockstep with greenhouse gas emissions. Once carbon dioxide, the major product of fossil fuel combustion, enters the atmosphere, it cannot be recaptured. The accumulation of carbon dioxide is irreversible and the accelerated melting of glaciers on mountains and of ice sheets in the Polar Regions is unstoppable.
From materials of: http://articlebiz.com/article/201352-1-bad-energy-policies-w~
Published: July 25, 2008
Published: July 25, 2008
Keywords:
energy,
bad energy,
energy policies,
sell energy,
energy prices,
energy becoming,
energy plan,
energy problems,
energy puzzle,
energy possible
Last relative articles:
Comments: [0] / Post comment:
29 Jul 2010 05:01:12
Constellation Energy cuts spending on Areva reactor venture - Lynchburg News and Advance
RTT News Constellation Energy cuts spending on Areva reactor venture Lynchburg News and Advance ... said in a conference call Wednesday that Constellation cannot move forward on the project without a loan guarantee from the US Department of Energy . ... Constellation Energy Net Soars After Year-Earlier Charges Constellation Energy profit lags Wall Street Constellation Energy Reports Second Quarter 2010 Results - -
29 Jul 2010 04:34:09
Other energy issues seep into spill legislation - Houston Chronicle
Telegraph.co.uk Other energy issues seep into spill legislation Houston Chronicle Jason Hutt, a lobbyist with Bracewell & Giuliani who represents energy companies, said the disclosure mandate is poorly conceived and appears to lack ... Senate's energy bill: What a disappointment House, Senate Democrats Race to Complete Oil Spill and Energy Packages Before ... US Republicans assail trimmed Democratic energy plan - -
29 Jul 2010 04:09:15
Investing in alternative energy will help Great Lakes - MSU State News
CBC.ca Investing in alternative energy will help Great Lakes MSU State News We should utilize our miles of beautiful coastlines and invest in alternative energy sources such as wind power. As is true with all technology, ... Energy company, EPA double efforts after Michigan oil spill Enbridge 2Q Adjusted Net Up; Reaffirms 2010 View Canadian Stocks Fall on Decline in US Durable-Goods Orders; Teck Drops - -
29 Jul 2010 01:48:11
NYMEX-Crude ends lower as oil inventories rise - Reuters
Washington Post NYMEX-Crude ends lower as oil inventories rise Reuters The US Energy Information Administration said commercial crude oil stocks rose 7.31 million barrels last week as imports jumped. EIA The forecast was for ... OIL FUTURES: Crude Retreats On Tepid Economic Outlooks Crude Oil Tumbles to One-Week Low After Surprise Increase in US Supplies Oil falls below $77 after surprise US supply jump - -
29 Jul 2010 00:55:18
Walter Energy 2Q Profit Soars On Higher Volume, Prices - Wall Street Journal
Walter Energy 2Q Profit Soars On Higher Volume, Prices Wall Street Journal Walter Energy Inc.'s (WLT) second-quarter earnings soared more than analysts had expected as revenue skyrocketed. The producer of metallurgical coal, ... Walter Energy Announces Second Quarter 2010 Earnings of $2.16 per Diluted Share Coking coal operation boosts Walter Energy Walter Energy Announces Second Quarter 2010 Earnings of $2.16 per Diluted Share